Skip to content
All peptides
HGF / c-Met agonist (cognitive)

Dihexa

Also known as: Dihexa acetate, N-hexanoic-Tyr-Ile-(6) aminohexanoic amide, PNB-0408, Hexanoyl-Tyr-Ile-Aha

Tier 3 — Animal / in vitroReviewed 2026-05-05

Animal-only synaptogenic peptide with replicated rodent cognitive-recovery signal across labs (notably Sun 2021 in transgenic AD mice). FDA removed dihexa acetate from 503A Category 2 in April 2026 with a PCAC review scheduled by Feb 2027. Important context: foundational lab work has a 2025 fraud finding (Athira / Kawas $4M DOJ settlement, one paper retracted) — read the reviewer notes.

Loading the AI assistant…

Overview

Dihexa is a small oligopeptide derived from angiotensin IV by the Wright/Harding lab at Washington State University, designed to potentiate hepatocyte growth factor (HGF) signaling at the c-Met receptor with the explicit goal of inducing dendritic spine formation (synaptogenesis) and rescuing cognitive function in animal models of Alzheimer's disease. The evidence base looks larger than it is. The foundational rodent work (McCoy 2013, Benoist 2014, and a series of supporting papers from the same lab) was produced in the same period during which Athira Pharma's former CEO and lab trainee Leen Kawas admitted — through a January 2025 ~$4 million False Claims Act settlement with the U.S. Department of Justice — to systematically falsifying and manipulating scientific images in her doctoral dissertation and published research between 2008 and 2012, in work directly supporting dihexa's procognitive claims. Benoist 2014 was retracted in April 2025; other Kawas-co-authored papers have not been formally retracted but are tainted by the same data-integrity finding. The strongest independent preclinical evidence is Sun 2021, a transgenic APP/PS1 mouse study from Chinese investigators with no lab overlap with the Wright/Harding/Kawas group — meaningful but a single independent replication. There are no completed published human trials of any phase. The Alzheimer's Drug Discovery Foundation's Cognitive Vitality assessment characterizes dihexa as preclinical-only and requiring substantial additional research.

Mechanism

Acts as a positive allosteric modulator / mimetic of hepatocyte growth factor (HGF) at its receptor c-Met (MET). c-Met activation drives PI3K/AKT and MAPK signaling and, in central neurons, can promote dendritic spine formation and synaptogenesis. Sun 2021 specifically traced the procognitive effect in APP/PS1 mice through PI3K/AKT activation, with the PI3K inhibitor wortmannin reversing the anti-inflammatory and anti-apoptotic effects. The mechanism framing is broadly supported by the wider c-Met / HGF literature; dihexa-specific mechanism claims that originated solely from the Wright/Harding/Kawas lab during 2008-2014 should be treated cautiously given the documented integrity findings on that lab's output. The proposed safety concern is not theoretical: HGF/c-Met signaling is a known oncogenic driver in multiple epithelial cancers (gastric, certain lung, hepatocellular), and any chronic systemic c-Met agonist carries that risk profile.

Evidence by indication

We classify each indication separately. The same peptide can be Tier 1 for one use and Tier 4 for another. Tiers reflect the published literature, not the strength of community framing.

Cognitive function in Alzheimer's-disease animal models (preclinical)

Tier 3medium confidence

Replicated rodent cognitive-recovery signal across labs and disease models. Anchor evidence is Sun 2021 (China Pharmaceutical University / Nanjing Medical University; no overlap with the originating Wright/Harding lab) — APP/PS1 transgenic AD mice, restored Morris water-maze performance, increased neuronal cell counts and synaptophysin, reduced neuroinflammation, all reversed by PI3K inhibition. Editorial caveat that does not vanish: foundational mechanistic work from the Wright/Harding lab between 2008-2014 is entangled with a $4M DOJ Athira False Claims Act settlement (Jan 2025) and one formal retraction (Benoist 2014, April 2025). Tier 3 reflects 'strong preclinical only' on the Sun 2021 anchor + class-level c-Met mechanism + the broader AngIV-class systematic review (Ho & Nation 2018), with the integrity caveat held openly in the reviewer notes rather than buried.

Alzheimer's disease in humans

Tier 4high confidence

No completed published human trial of any phase. The Alzheimer's Drug Discovery Foundation's Cognitive Vitality assessment notes the absence of human trial data and characterizes dihexa as an experimental compound requiring substantial additional research before clinical validation. Community marketing as an AD intervention is not supported by clinical evidence.

Cognitive enhancement in healthy adults (nootropic)

Tier 4high confidence

Mechanistic extrapolation from animal disease models. Rodent studies were specifically in cognitively-impaired animals (scopolamine, aged, transgenic AD); enhancement in cognitively-normal humans is a distinct claim with zero supporting evidence.

No primary citations are anchored to this indication — the tier reflects the absence of usable literature, not a missing reference.

Peripheral nerve regeneration

Tier 4medium confidence

Weiss 2021 reported improved limb-function recovery in a rat sciatic-nerve damage-repair model. Single preclinical study with overlapping lab provenance to the Wright/Harding group; no human evidence; tainted-by-association concern given the documented integrity findings on the wider dihexa-specific literature from that lab orbit.

Studied dose ranges

The ranges below come from published trial protocols where available, and from documented self-experimenter consensus where the literature does not include human dose-finding work. The notes flag which is which.

10,00045,000 mcgonce daily · oral or sublingual (community use, no human PK data)

Animal studies dose ~2 mg/kg orally in rats. Community human dosing is typically 10–45 mg/day oral or sublingual based on body-weight extrapolation from rodent studies. There is no published human PK or dose-finding study to validate this. The dose range here is descriptive of community practice, not endorsed.

Contraindications

  • Any active or prior malignancy (HGF/c-Met signaling drives tumor invasion in many cancer types — this is a real, mechanistic safety concern, not theoretical)
  • Family history of c-Met-driven cancers (gastric, certain lung, hepatocellular)
  • Pregnancy and breastfeeding
  • Use during chemotherapy or immunotherapy (interaction with cancer biology unknown)
  • Known hypersensitivity

Reported side effects

  • Unknown in humans — no published human safety data
  • Theoretical: tumor promotion via c-Met signaling (the most serious uncharacterized risk)
  • Theoretical: off-target effects on systemic c-Met-expressing tissues (liver, kidney, vascular endothelium)
  • Anecdotal community reports: headache, anxiety, sleep disturbance — uncontrolled

Reconstitution & storage

Most community use is oral or sublingual — no reconstitution. The hexanoyl modification was designed for oral bioavailability and BBB penetration; vendor preparations vary in quality.

Storage. Vendor-dependent. Powder forms typically refrigerated; oral capsules at room temperature, dry, protected from light.

Open the peptide calculator → to compute exact draw volumes for your specific vial and BAC water choice.

Editorial note

DRAFT — Wayne-direction call (2026-05-05). overall_tier = 3 reflects Wayne's editorial direction; the evidence-tier-classifier skill's default reading on this corpus would be Tier 4 because of the Athira / Kawas data-integrity findings affecting the foundational Wright/Harding-lab papers. Tier 3 is defensible if anchored on Sun 2021 (independent transgenic-AD mouse replication) + Ho & Nation 2018 (class-level systematic review) + the c-Met mechanism story + the FDA direction-of-travel as soft signal — that is the rationale held in the indication's `rationale` field. Key facts the editorial reader needs to hold simultaneously: (1) The April 2026 FDA 503A Category 2 removal IS real, with PCAC review scheduled by/before Feb 2027 — that is a *scheduling of formal scientific evaluation by an advisory committee*, not approval, and compounding pharmacies still cannot legally compound dihexa today. (2) The foundational Wright/Harding-lab work has documented integrity problems: $4M DOJ settlement (Jan 2025), CEO admission of systematic image fabrication 2008-2012, Benoist 2014 retraction (April 2025). The fraud context never disappears; it lives openly in this entry. (3) Sun 2021 is the only genuinely independent dihexa-specific preclinical replication. (4) Zero human trials. The oncology contraindication is non-negotiable — c-Met / HGF signaling is a known oncogenic driver, and that is the safety concern that should never be softened. Lessons-learned for the editorial process: a paper retraction in a compound's foundational lab should always trigger a deeper integrity review of the wider corpus, not just exclusion of the single retracted paper. If a future reviewer disagrees with the Tier 3 call, this note is here to make the decision auditable.

Citations

  1. [1]
    AngIV-Analog Dihexa Rescues Cognitive Impairment and Recovers Memory in the APP/PS1 Mouse via the PI3K/AKT Signaling Pathway
    Sun X, Deng Y, Fu X, Wang S, Duan R, Zhang Y, et al. · Brain Sciences · 2021 · PMID 34827486
    Genuine independent rodent replication (China Pharmaceutical University / Nanjing Medical University; no overlap with the Wright/Harding/Kawas lab). Transgenic APP/PS1 model, PI3K/AKT mechanism trace. The strongest single piece of dihexa-specific preclinical evidence not entangled with the Athira fraud history. Anchor for the Tier 3 preclinical-AD-cognition indication.
    View source
  2. [2]
    Cognitive benefits of angiotensin IV and angiotensin-(1-7): A systematic review of experimental studies
    Ho JK, Nation DA · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · 2018 · PMID 29733881
    Systematic review of 32 animal studies establishing the class-level cognitive signal for angiotensin IV and analogs. Class-level support for the Tier 3 preclinical indication; not a dihexa-specific replication.
    View source
  3. [3]
    Stem cell, Granulocyte-Colony Stimulating Factor and/or Dihexa to promote limb function recovery in a rat sciatic nerve damage-repair model: Experimental animal studies
    Weiss JB, Phillips CJ, Malin EW, Gorantla VS, Harding JW, Salgar SK · Annals of Medicine and Surgery (Lond) · 2021
    Single-lab rat model on peripheral nerve regeneration. Includes Harding (the dihexa originating-lab senior author) — partial overlap with the lab orbit that produced the fraud-tainted work, so cited with that caveat.
    View source
  4. [4]
    Dihexa — Cognitive Vitality assessment
    Alzheimer's Drug Discovery Foundation · ADDF Cognitive Vitality (alzdiscovery.org) · 2021
    Independent expert assessment confirming the absence of human trial data and characterizing dihexa as preclinical-only. Anchors the Tier 4 framing for the human-applicable indications.
    View source
  5. [5]
    Athira Pharma Inc. Agrees to Pay $4M to Settle False Claims Act Allegations Related to Scientific Research Misconduct
    U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Public Affairs · DOJ press release · 2025
    Documents the January 2025 $4M settlement and the underlying admission by former Athira CEO Leen Kawas of systematic image manipulation between 2008-2012 in dihexa-supporting research. The single most important editorial-context citation for this entry.
    View source
  6. [6]
    The procognitive and synaptogenic effects of angiotensin IV-derived peptides are dependent on activation of the hepatocyte growth factor/c-met system — RETRACTED 2025
    Benoist CC, Kawas LH, Zhu M, Tyson KA, Stillmaker L, Appleyard SM, Wright JW, Wayman GA, Harding JW (RETRACTED) · Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics · 2014
    Cited as a record of the retracted foundational mechanistic paper, NOT as supporting evidence. Retracted April 2025 following image-manipulation investigation tied to the Athira / Kawas DOJ settlement. Listed here so the editorial context is visible; should never be used to support an indication tier.
    View source
  7. [7]
    FDA Announces Removal of 12 Peptides from 503A Category 2 and Schedules PCAC Meetings
    U.S. Food and Drug Administration / PCAC · FDA notice / industry coverage (Frier Levitt, Orrick, RAPS) · 2026
    Documents the April 15, 2026 removal of dihexa acetate (plus 11 other peptides) from 503A Category 2 and the PCAC review schedule. Anchors the fda_status field. NOT evidence of safety or efficacy — just regulatory scheduling.
    View source